Showing posts with label batsmen. Show all posts
Showing posts with label batsmen. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 22, 2020

Rayleigh cc - Batting wagon wheels







Updated June 2025
Philip Wolff 7th XI batter
Played against this bloke 14/6/25 on the 3rd ground at Wickford memorial park. He batted down the order at No.7 and from the outset looked like a bloke that could hold a bat.
Looking at his data on Playcricket which goes back to 1980, he looks like decent batter and with my first over being as usual a bit ropey and the field up, I went for 13, but then settled. Once settled and getting the line and length sorted he was then reduced to singles and watched from both ends realising I was potentially a threat. 
In this game, he was the linchpin to any chance of a win or resistance and so had to go. As I got through my overs and took the wickets of two of his partners; One caught at square leg and one LBW, he could see that I had a couple of variations. In the end I got him bat/pad caught by the keeper in a silly point position. Not a dismissal I've had before. In my first ropey over Wolff hit me for 13. Thereafter a cover drive for 4 that should have been fielded. 

On reflection, I had the field up on the first over that I didn't bowl well in, but could have easily reduced the impact setting a deep legside field with blokes on the boundary, so this is something I might look into doing in future with my first over, then adapt the field as I settle. I think it's also useful to see if the batter see themselves as strong on the leg-side and possibly sets them up to be caught if they get it wrong?  Definitely something to consider going forwards? *Not Steve Lynch though (See below). 


Steven Lynch 1st XI batter
I've not been keeping up with this of late as the means to record the wagon wheels has changed and its not as efficient, but felt that this one needed to be done.

This was a game during Rayleigh's cricket week and the 3rd time in succession that I'd been involved and I came up against this bloke again (Steven Lynch 1st team bat see details below), having faced him last year and got the same treatment again this year. 

So I was brought on around the 20th over after drinks with both players batting well nearing their 50's at which point they'd have to retire. The wicket was either the end wicket or '2nd in' over to one side meaning one side was very short and the other big. I was brought on to bowl from the northern end meaning the off-side was short and the leg-side big. 

My first over was eventful, opting to try and bowl at the stumps, the first few balls were decent and singles were had and a dot ball. Then I bowled at Lynch... leg-stump line-pretty full and got his pads, went up for it and the umpire... a kid - looked flummoxed as though he new it was out, but was more than aware that this was their best player and the consequences of giving him out were the game would probably be gone, after a few seconds of going over it he said 'Not out'. I don't bother questioning these decision, it happens so often and there's not point. 

That kind of threw me...what am I supposed to do I thought? The decision seemed to be that he was susceptible to a ball on the leg-stump and that I should continue, completely ignoring what happened last year. The next one was fuller - too full in fact - a full toss on leg-stump and he thumped it for 4. I persisted with this same line as the other bloke Same Keene looked lost as what to do. But Lynch was in my head and I couldn't seem to bowl at him and eventually in the 3rd over he hit me for a massive 6 over the leg-side and Michael Gray pulled me out of the attack, which I was fine about. 

The game progressed and both of these blokes reached their 50's and retired and I said I'd come back on if needed. But in the time, the rest of the team were bowled out, I was able to reflect on what had happened and decided that if I bowled at him again I'd bowl a mixture of Flippers and Leg-Breaks on an off-stump or just outside line. Which seemed risky with the short boundary. The last wickets fell and coincided with coming back with these two batting again and it worked. For Lynch everything was either off-stump and just outside and he was seemingly only able to hit singles down to deep mid off and to covers on the boundary, which was fine as it meant I was then able to bowl a more attacking line to Keene and he was lost as to what to do and eventually a ball on a good length targeting middle was edged as he defended and Keagan too his 8th catch behind the stumps to finish the game. 

In conclusion, for next year, or if I'm in the return match at our ground in August during our cricket week the key points are (1). Just don't bowl anywhere near a leg-stump or wide of leg-stump line. Otherwise its going for 4 or 6. What worked today even with the small boundary was to bowl a channel or off-stump line. (2). Vary your deliveries; I just bowled Flippers and Leg-Breaks, but I've got a top-spinner which I had tried earlier that didn't work out - that would be an effective delivery. One of the other players I was speaking to about how relaxed he looked while they were retrieving one of his 4's said that if he was going to get out it would be to a slow spinning ball and that what I was doing was what normally got him out.

On the off-side, the shots weren't expansive, he seemed to have a lot of time and played the ball late well within the crease. Looking at his records he has never been stumped, so that's not an option!

This is an approximation of Steven Lynch's wagon wheel from this game - all bowlers. TBH the majority of the leg-side in front of square were mine, but anyone who strayed legside was hit. He hit 10 x 4's and 3 6's and scored 84 off 50 balls for a not out. 


























The ariel photograph shows the position of the wicket/strip and the shortness of the boundary. Once I'd figured out that it was a lost cause trying to bowl at the stumps with leg-breaks I then went for the off-side line as mentioned and this then restricted his shots to the green zone. The field set is a suggestion and not one that I used. The field I bowled to had 9 and 10 on the boundaries on the leg-side deep mid wicket. Maybe someone also in conventional mid-wicket. 

This is based on a vague memory of last years game and this game. It could well need modifying, but my analysis was that he didn't look to place the ball short leg-side in order to rotate the strike, it was either 4's or 6's. 

Some of his data...



















_______________________________________________
S.Harwood - Opening Batsman R/H

I'm writing this up 7 months later in the winter, so only have basic notes to work with. Bowled Joe Thompson (18) caught Sam Good. Joe Thompson Medium/Fast see here
Notes on Harwood- "No front foot defense, hardly moves his feet, slashes at the ball which appeared to be his main shot - top-edged Joe down to long off. No record of how many times he played and missed, but looking at Joe's bowling data and knowing how Joe bowled I'd have guessed a good few times.


M.Walker - R/H - No2 













M.Walker - This game I watched rather than played in, my son was the opening bowler. As I recall I was experimenting with different ways of recording the data and may have also been trying to video the action as well. Having seen both the openers playing and missing it wasn't until Harwood was dismissed that I started to record the play and misses. He struggled against my son Joe Thompson with Joe going for 6-2-9-1. It wasn't until Hayton came on that I got into that aspect of the analysis. From that analysis the initial impression is that he plays and misses against the slower bowlers Hayton and Debond, with his wicket being taken by Hayton on 46.

S.Gosling - R/H - No,3 Bat 

Very static - slashes at the ball outside of off, played a supporting role allowing the other players to take the strike. Bowled Debond (SLA) mixed with LA wrist-spin.
Owen Davies - R/H - No,4 Bat ______________________________


Played and missed against Chris Debond and willing to leave the ball outside of off. Doesn't move around the crease and looks susceptible to a good off-cutter. The balls on the on-side where hit off of a shorter length.

Bowled LBW A.Hayton who bowls R/A finger-spin varying length, speed and mixes arm balls with balls that break.





B.Walker - R/H - No,5 Bat ________________________________

_____________________________________________________________
J.Wright - R/H - No,6 Bat

J. Wright was the most destructive coming in at No.6. He seemed able to hit the ball pretty much where he wanted. Uses his feet well to both the fast and slow bowlers - of our bowlers he struggled the most against A.Hayton who bowls off-spin mixed with arm balls accurately, varying his speed and bowling generally a good full length. Despite all the positives on his part he was recorded as playing and missing against all of the bowlers - but especially A.Hayton.
________________________________________
Updated Aug 22.
S.Harmonsworth - R/H - Bat No.3



Bowled against this bloke today 2/8/22 Three years after the initial wagon wheel and he's three years older and considerably better I'd say. I was brought on to bowl early bowling against Sam batting at No.3 along with an aggressive big hitting No.2. Sam himself is an assertive and aggressive bat walking down the wicket to bowlers if the keeper is back, looks to hit the ball hard, no deft shots, don't recall any late cuts, just sees the ball and hits it hard. In 2022 if you look at his data on Playcricket he's scored 100 + in a first XI game.
The *blue lines on the updated wagon wheel are representative of his shots today. He played with a 59 off 52 balls not out; having retired and come back on at the end of the game. Strike rate of 113.
*Most of the data has been recalled from memory rather than notes made, but I reckon that's about right or thereabouts.

_________________________________________________________________________________
M.Patel - R/H - No,8 Bat 

_________________________________________________________________________________

Richard Virrender - 6th XI                  Bat No.2
The following batsmen I have very little notes on and the wagon wheels are lacking in detail as the records were made using a different format. I've not made any notes on whether they're right or left handed, so if just guessed based on the wagon wheel records. What I do remember was that this was a close match that we lost and they were good bunch of blokes.
Richard Virrender batted at No.2 and was not out for 57 off of 104 balls. Predominantly a leg-side player from this first look... Pull-shots primarily, not always aggressive ones, sometimes a deft one just to steer the ball down to fine-leg for a single. The other shot was the on-drive to the position I was fielding at (7), but this was easily dealt with. The impression I've got was that he was far more susceptible to getting out playing shots on the off-side. Shots on the stumps on a threatening length he gets behind with a straight bat. Actively looking to make runs all the time - a busy player. His data on play cricket is pretty impressive... He's recorded as having played since 2005. In that time he's scored 651 x 4's, he's scored 50 on 40 occasions, 1 x 100. On average he's scored 15.73% of teams runs, one year he contributed 30% of the teams runs and averages 30.92% runs per game. Only had 9 ducks and gets out by being caught 32.71% of the time and gets bowled 35.51% of the time. Hardly ever has been stumped 0.47% of the time. A solid player.
_________________________________________________________________________________
Dan Athol No.6

Athol didn't hang around 29 runs off of 36 balls. Strike rate of 80.56. Match data here
Bowled LBW Rob Brooks (Off-spinner).























On the play cricket website his records suggest that he doesn't play all season (8 games over 2 years). Athol accounts for 4.73% of team runs (2019) and average 8.83. The data suggests that he's most likely to be either bowled or caught as both record around 28% of dismissals. Looks to be a potential candidate for a run-out as he's been dismissed that way 14% of the time. Get your fast younger players in the game if they're looking to run singles? Athol's play cricket batting data can be accessed by this link here
________________________________________________________________________________
Sean Treweek No.8 























Not a lot on Treweek - from this first look primarily a leg-side player. His data goes back to 2016 and he's played primarily in this team. His contribution to the team batting is 6.99% (2019) and his highest score was 64 in 2018. Generally loses his wicket bowled or caught which accounts for 22% for each method. A fair number of not outs 29%, but that's down the fact that he bats at 8. Average 22. See his play cricket data here 
2019 saw him play 17 games, so he'll probably be a regular in 2020?

_________________________________________________________________________________
Jack Himpfen Jones No.4






















Himpfen Jones (All-rounder) bowled 2nd change in our match. Played for Rayleigh since 2007. Played 55 games at an average of 8.11. High score of 51 (Only 50 + score). Scores 4.13% of team runs. Gets out primarily being bowled 55% of the time and that's followed up with 30% being caught and 4% of the time stumped. 
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Jack Andrews No.3



























Jack Andrews; His records go back to 2015. He's played 29 games, scored 381 runs at an average of 15.24. An aggressive or accurate player with 48 fours to his name and 2 sixes. Scores 8.88% of team runs and has had 5 ducks in 29 games. Gets out bowled - 50% of the time, caught 21.43%, LBW 7.14% of the time and stumped 3.47% as of 2019.


Cheers to everyone for letting take the pictures and go well this coming season - be sure to check out the oppositions wagon wheels in the side-bar right. Hope to see you this coming season!

Check out some of my other posts here...


Saturday, January 18, 2020

Eastwood cc - wagon wheels and bowling plans

11/5/24 - I don't this as much as these days because some people took exception to me making notes between the overs.


12/6/21

Basildon & Pitsea 5th XI v Eastwoods 4th XI

It'll be interesting to see who turns up for Eastwood for this game as I've played against them twice now and it's always been a massive mis-match. But it's on Saturday during the main season, so I'm hoping that most of their younger, better players will be involved in League games. Looking at the previous wagon-wheels the main tactic who-ever is bowling is keep it off the leg-side as they're all seemingly strong on the leg-side which is standard advice, but, not so easily executed.The weather promises to be good though.

Blimey - I've been involved in two consecutive wins and again another close and good game.

Our team was made up of mostly kids, a few of Dads, Heinricht and me. The captain was Fahran who played with us in the Lee Dutton years and he won the toss and chose to bat, which I always think is a bad move as it means if we get bowled out cheap, there's nothing in the game for the bowlers. That more or less happened, but not to the extent that there was no hope at all, but I didn't hold out much hope of bowling. The bowling was interesting - primarily really loopy and slow, but seemingly accurate in terms of line and length and we were all out for 116 off of 36 overs in a 40 overs game.

The kids were given the roles of openers and Charlie HD had a wicket with mid stump full toss. *look at the bowling figures - especially Barath's Mine are pretty good as well, but I was spraying a load of them down the leg-side and each time I did, the team were saying 'Brilliant bowling Thomo' whereas I was thinking surely that's wide, but the bloke wasn't calling them and I wasn't looking in case he was - as it was I wasn't bowling that well and to then see him with his arms wide, may have made me more tense as I was still struggling with my run-up despite spending some time this week trying to address the issue. If you look at my bowling figures I bowled 6 overs, took 2 wickets (LBW's) with one maiden and went for 14 runs. But... of the 14 runs 9 were wides!!!!!! 


 Fahran's son Armaan took a wicket as well. They got off to a decent start in comparison with use going along at 4 an over, but by about 40 off of 10 overs 25 or so of the runs were off of wides. Then I was thrown the ball and bowled one of my best spells in recent years from the 'Seaside end'. One of my first balls took the edge of the bat and was dropped at slips by 'Jack' looked like an easy take to me, but he said it came on to him quickly. A bit later I got a top edge that was in the air between point and covers and easily caught in some instances, but our nearest player Reece, didn't get to it from point.

The 2 wickets I took were both LBW's. One of them took a 2nd appeal as the umpires face was one of uncertainty as to whether he should give it. From where I was it looked like the bloke was trapped in front of the leg-stump, but it wasn't going down leg. I could see the look on the blokes face kind of saying I think that's out but, so I appealed again and the finger went up.

Wickets fell at regular stages and with my spell it seemed that I'd got us back in the game, we just needed to continue taking wickets and field well and we did. There were further good bowling spells from Heinricht and Sri, but the bowling was backed up with good fielding and tactics just short of 80 with about 38 runs to get off of about 10-12 overs they had a bloke who looked like he was their last real hope. But against him was the fact that he was probably the last of the recognised bats and the fact that the outfield was so slow. We used the tactic of allowing him the single and then bringing the field up and not allowing the other bloke to get any runs and this worked exceptionally well despite the fact that in the meantime at 20 overs in we lost Charlie HD so were fielding with 10. All of us tried to bowl on outside of the off-stump. With a decent group of players on the offside. Martin fielded well in the covers and Barath fielded well at Square leg.

With 5 overs to go they needed 5 an over and I started a count down so everyone knew what we had to do. That 36th over went for 5 as the better bloke and their number 11 moved to close down the game, but now trying to strike the ball harder the risk factor increase and the inevitable happened and Fahran took the last wicket. The ensuing celebrations were quite exhuberent as it had been a close game and we'd bowled them out within 116. Fahran did a little speech/team talk at the end to the kids using me as an example of commitment saying that I'd showed the whole team up with my skills and commitment in the field despite the fact that I'm 60 - 'Dave's shown us by example - what's required to win a game, that's how we've got to play like in future. 


*The bloke wrongly name on the scoresheet spoke to me afterwards asking 'Why couldn't I get you away down the legside (I'd bowled a tight line on the legside) because normally that's my shot down to fine leg and I couldn't get a bat on it, the ball seemed to be skidding through? I explained what I was doing and he said "Yeah I knew it was unusual". 

Won again today in the 5ths another really close and good game. Fahran - remember him from a few years ago was the captain. Decided to bat first. We walked off in the 36th over having been bowled out for 116. Looked like a lost cause, I wasn't even sure I'd get a bowl. He had all the kid bowling we were had then 40 for 2 after 11 over, but of that 40 - 25 were wides bowled by the kids. Then he threw me the ball at around 50 and bowled probably one of my best spells ever, I've not looked yet at the figures, but the scoreboard didn't move much during my spell and I took 2 wickets - both LBW's and had 2 catches not taken or dropped by a couple fat lads. But after the kids had gone the rest of us bowled tight and got the wickets one by one. They had 5 overs left and had one good bat and one wafty bat and they had 5 an over to get, but we fielded really well moving the field around and we got the last wicket in the 36th over. Twas a really good game - 2 wins in a row!






Updated July 16th Aug 2020
  52 views


2nd look at the batsmen of Eastwood in another friendly game and yeah it was friendly - a nice bunch of blokes. It looked like it was going to be a rain affected game and it rained here in Basildon before I set out for the game at around 11.00 and we're only about 10 miles away from Eastwood, but by the time I'd arrived at their ground, the weather looked okay, just a bit grey and windy. 

The wind was coming from the 'Coast', so anyone bowling from the A127 end would be bowling into the wind. The wicket was in the centre of the square meaning the boundaries were pretty much equal either side of the wicket. The wicket was green - really green (See image below), but the outfield which is used for football was rough. The wicket was dry despite the earlier rain.


There's three wicket at this venue and we were on the southerly one. The toss was had and we were put into bowl and we had a full team of players which was okay. The balance of their side old blokes v young blokes was similar to ours, but their young blokes were in their 20's whereas our are all U16's with the exception of Steve and Luke who only plays once or twice a year. 

Talking to their captain the writing was on the wall from the outset "This is probably the best 3rd XI we've ever had". Whereas looking at our team my assessment would be we're probably more of a 4th or 5th XI especially with a Non-Specialist wicket keeper and players that only turn out once or twice a year to help out.

Unfortunately, we never got to see if we could get anywhere near chasing down their score of 232 off of 35 overs. To be honest I don't think we'd have had a chance in hell and I reckon we were lucky to have been put in to bowl, as we at least had a few hours bowling and fielding! Whilst we were having tea, the rain which had been light and intermittent, got a lot heavier and the captains decided enough was enough and we were spared the inevitable trashing that would have ensued if we'd have got to bat. 




T.Ward - No.1__________________________________________
T.Ward played well against us. He had a good range of options, but primarily off of A.Keeps accurate bowling (Marked in red) which generally targets the stumps, he was hitting the ball to leg. His approach was positive and he was looking to rotate the strike frequently and keep the runs ticking over. With so few runs made through the off-side and some of the balls going down towards 3rd man, it looks as though he's either edged these and they've evaded the slips? He therefore looks as though he might be susceptible to balls on the off-stump or just outside. I seem to recall the shots through covers were pretty decent, so it's potentially a shot he's going to have a go at if offered? A plan that might be an option would be as below in figure 1













1. Set a strong leg-side field with your fastest most agile players in positions 5,6 and 7. The bloke at 6, ensure that he's fast and willing to run around and a capable catcher too. These three players on their own should have an impact on Wards ability to score runs at the rate he did in our game. But, I think the main aspect of the plan would be to bowl an off-stump 'Corridor of uncertainty' line if possible with a gaping great hole as indicated by the diagram (Fig 1). I recall the 3 shots that were scored through the 3rd man region were sketchy and these were accompanied with a few play and misses. He can play through the covers region as well as straight, but it appears to not be his preferred approach and it may be a weakness? So,  make sure your slips fielder (3) is a decent slips catcher as well as Gully and Point. 
Leave the blue zone empty and see how he gets on, vary the line, remembering not to stray on the legs, try a few wide of off and see how he deals with it, but I reckon he'll struggle with this approach. See this link here for other tactics (Starts about 2 mins in), especially if you're a slow bowler.
M.Hare No.2_________________________________
























R.Palmer No.3______________________________________























C.Hill
No.4_____________________________________
C.Hill was another busy player. He retired thankfully. Most of his runs come off one or our U15's players who wasn't finding his rhythm. So, I'm not sure this would be representative of his normal playing because of that? If you look at the bowling of Keep, Edmunds and Charlie HD (U15's) all whom bowled well, he wasn't able to score in the same ways as he was against R. Eustace. Interestingly, against all of the other bowlers his mains scoring areas were off-side, so to set a field to limit his scoring would be relatively easy. With regards attacking, probably a standard field bowling an off-stump line with a slip in place. 
R.Creasy
No.5_____________________________________


A.Creasy looked like a good player and I had the misfortune of having to bowl at him which didn't go that well. Furthermore, he figured out what I was doing with the ball which is a first. Unfortunately, my knee was playing up and my bowling was pretty poor. Like the other young players he looked to run singles when he wasn't smacking the ball into Rochford! But, therein lies the possibility in a weakness. 

The majority of his shots were leg-side, playing across the line with aggression (Slog-sweeps), so a couple of good catchers on the boundary, especially if there is a bigger boundary option when bowling. As with Ward above, try and defend on the leg-side and have the option of a big gap on the off-side to encourage him to try and score through the covers regions. Only 3 scoring shots were played through there, so that would suggest this isn't an area that he's comfortable hitting the ball in? 

Same as for Ward, bowl an off-stump line and keep it off his legs. If you're a slow bowler you may find he steps away from the stumps exposing them in order to access the leg-side which is by far his preferred option. He had one miss-hit slog-sweep that went up and was almost caught by the keeper at forward square leg but he clashed with the fielder running in from Mid-Wicket and they clashed head despite the keeper calling for it and the ball was put down. That incident led to the player being taken off to Hospital for a check-up because of suspected concussion.

The stepping away from the stumps to the slow bowler is interesting as it provides an opportunity to use a faster ball if you have one. Variations in speed might also be useful as would be different levels of over-spin or back-spin as these might induce a miss-timed shot as with the one that went straight up.
A.Creasy
No.6_____________________________________
























Armitage
No.7_____________________________________



















































Just to put things into perspective. The bowlers above Three of them are 60 and above one, is over 70 and another 45 plus. The rest of them are small boys U15's. 3 of the older players have knee replacements or suffering from on-going knee issues to boot! Funnily enough the best bowling figures are that of our best batsman Brian Waterman who would have been our only real chance of putting up a fight with the bat - he's come away with 2 wickets for 5 off of 3 overs, not bad for a bloke who's 70!
Please note - You set these fields at your own risk. The owner of the blog is in no way responsible for you getting carted around the park for 4's and 6's. Seek professional advice and guidance if in doubt.

28/4/19__________________________________________________ Pragash Galeshaningham Bat No.5





21/3/20 - Stuck at home in the Coronovirus lock-down, I thought I'd go through some of these and update them and adopt a uniform approach. 

This game was played in 24/4/19. I've got records for 4 players from this club. First up is Pragash Ganeshalingham. As far as I'm aware he's a first XI player most of the time. Today he played in a 2nd XI friendly game. I didn't bowl against him, but watched him and made some notes for all you wrist-spinners. So here's the low down on a first look at him.


First game of the season and it was cold 12-15 c with a brisk wind of up to 45mph. Pragash batted at No.5 and scored a quick 12 and was caught Anthony Ayres at deep mid-wicket off RA finger-spinner John "Moondog" Bedfords bowling. John bowls a off-stump/wide off-stump line, varying flight, speed and spin. He said that today he was mixing up the spin with a lot of straight balls that were just beating the outside edge of the bat. As mentioned already, 
I didn't bowl at him so the analysis here is a combination of the bowling from both ends, but amalgamated at one end for illustration purposes. From what I recall his 4's were hit mostly when Debond was bowling from the A127 end and he was targeting the shorter boundary.


We had 10 men per team and the field placings were conventional, nothing odd or tactical.

He was caught Ayres (Red line) bowled John "Moondog" Bedford RH finger-spinner. He may have had a leg glance, but Bedford brought me in at a shorter fine leg, to cut that shot off and back when I was recording these games I didn't use to record the dot balls. 

There's not a great deal to deduce from this first look at him other than to make a note of the fact that he was dismissed by our finger-spinner who was mixing up his flight, length, speed and bowling arm-balls. A lot of balls were seen to beat the outside edge.


The other key observation to make is that he's a  predominantly leg-side player. I've looked at his records on Playcricket and for some unknown reason there are very few for Eastwood cc and Pragash doesn't appear on any score sheets. On their own website though there's more information - click here and you can see that in a few games he batted well with totals of 114, 61 and 57.


Using the evidence here and remember it is just one game at the very start of the season in a Friendly match as Wrist-Spinner you've got two basic options. (1). See how it goes turning it away from the bat bowling an off-stump/corridor of uncertainty line. With our finger spinner he stayed very much in his crease, playing with a straight bat and he looked to be struggling with the only shot option being to turn it around the corner down to fine-leg and that was soon cut off as an option. Shortly after that, looking to be more assertive he was our caught deep-ish mid-wicket. 


(2). The other option if you're boundaries are deep on the leg-side would be to gamble and look to get him out playing leg-side. Although, I have to point out his leg-side play wasn't particularly aerial, most of it along the ground, just hit hard. I'd say that he prefers to play medium pace/seam bowling and possibly struggles with spin and I reckon he'd very susceptible to anyone that bowls with a decent variation. I wouldn't personally start with a leg-side line, I'd bowl outside of off initially to see if the wicket offers any turn and bounce. If it is, then consider this option?


Personally if I get to bowl at him in the season which is doubtful as he's playing several divisions above me I'd go for this field and strategy here...


Again, I have to say that I didn't get a long look at what his strengths and weaknesses are so this is a very basic plan. 

Keep the ball away from his legs because as we can see from above that's his scoring zone. Use the tactic of leaving a gap in the covers and try and get him to drive through there, as no-one was hit through that region. The other shot he had was turning the ball around the corner targeting the fine-leg region, with the ball spinning away from the bat this is going to be an unlikely approach. With the scores on the website indicating he's capable of going big, this field may only serve as starting point and may have to be adapted quickly?














One last point this wicket was pretty good and we bowled first having lost the toss. It's been pretty dry recently with very little rain. It rained lightly the night before and during the game, but the wicket was good with good consistent bounce and turn. An over-spun ball should work well. I had a knackered finger so was unable to bowl flippers and relied solely on my leg-breaks and it worked okay.
 

Please note - You set these fields at your own risk. The owner of the blog is in no way responsible for you getting carted around the park for 4's and 6's. Seek professional advice and guidance if in doubt.
Ciaran Turner__________________________________________________________________



27th April 2019
Friendly game at Belfairs park ground. 

Again, another player whose shots primarily had a leg-side bias.  He played one or two off-side shots including one cover-dive for 4. He did well against our 2nd off-spinner Rob Brooks scoring a good series of 4’s and one hefty 6 over the long eastern boundary towards the estate. 

 Having watched him from  the slips it was obvious that when I bowled I’d do so outside of the off-stump. This worked well and he didn’t appear to have any answers for the ball turning away from his bat pitched on a good line and length. Any balls that I did have that went awry he dispatched for 4 through the region mid-wicket to backward of square leg. I blocked that gap though in response to a suggestion from one of our new players Sai, and was able to get him off strike. All the subsequent balls that were leg-side were thereafter kept down to singles.

Ciaran does have a cover-drive and it was seen used against our 2nd finger-spinner, so it might be teased out of him if your bowling that wide of off-stump line and then you're in the game. 

Note. As with the other players from this game Pragash Ganeshalingham - R.Ruffell P.Bartlett the analysis has been collated from one look in a friendly game. Last year Ciaran scored 2 x 50's and in this game 36, so he may be a challenge as the season goes on. See here for some basic records, again, unfortunately there's no data on the play cricket website.

His downfall came in the same way as Ruffell. Having spoken to Ruffell it seemed that they agreed (with only 6 or so overs to go) they needed to up the ante and looked to go big. In Turners case instead of waiting for the leg-side balls and playing to his strengths he had a go at one of Robs deliveries looking to hit it straight down the ground over Robs head. No doubt with the ball turning into him and dipping with the spin, it wasn’t middled and was skewed with a more Mid-on bias where it was caught by the Mid-on fielder Nindi Kaisi.

When I face him again in the future, I’d adopt exactly the same field and plan as for his partner the No.4 batsman Ruffell...















My other active blogs include…

This is an example of some of the bowling vids on my Youtube channel


R.Ruffell______________________________

R.Ruffell. This bloke batted at No.4. Initially he played a few late cuts as well as leg-side glances to the seamers, but once the spin bowlers came on his game switched to almost exclusively scoring shots through the leg-side as per the diagram below. He struggle against John Bedford’s off-breaks especially once he’d seen the arm-ball variation. Anything that was on or outside of leg-stump and he was onto it looking to score runs and I’d say that 70%-75% of his runs were scored through that region, so initially you’d be looking to have a strong leg-side field to cut off opportunities for him to get off the mark.

Against both our off-spinners he stayed well within the crease careful even when at full stretch trying to get bat on ball he was careful to leave his back foot planted as our wicket keeper Daniel Vanderputt was on his game with taking the ball and whipping the bales off.

I got to bowl at him in the last 12 overs and he was always looking to get me away on the leg-side, but any balls that were on or around the off-stump he was struggling with. I quickly adopted this line and tried to stick to it and it worked with the ball only just evading the edge several times as he came forwards to defend against the turning ball. His undoing came about seemingly after the other batsman Ciaran Turner had a conversation in the middle with him. Turner was scoring at a fast rate off of Rob Brooks our other ‘Offie’ and it looked like it was agreed that Ruffell should also take a more aggressive approach and this was his un-doing. The next ball of the over Ruffell came out of his crease walking down the wicket as I speared in a faster ball which may have drifted a little. The ball pitched on about leg, spun and went through the gate and hit the off-stump. I’d kind of guessed from the fact that there’d been a conversation between the two batsmen that Ruffell would change the tempo of his approach.





























Going on the evidence provided by this encounter and the wagon wheel, I’d start with the field here below…


Rationale; We didn’t see a proliferation of off-side driving shots to any bowler, there may have been one good one, but that was hit, so he has it in his locker. What we did see was that he struggles with the ball turning away from the edge of the bat on a good line and length targeting his off-stump and the corridor of uncertainty. What do know is that he’s far stronger on the leg-side.

Tactic No.1 do not bowl leg-side. Set a defensive field initially as per the plan here below to keep any leg-side shots down to one, although ideally we don’t want any balls down that side as it will allow him to rotate the strike and get someone like Bartlett on strike and upset the flow of play P. Bartlett

Tactic No.2 bowl a tight off-side line primarily using your stock delivery, from what I saw with a slip in place and a good keeper this will probably do the trick – you’re very likely to get him caught behind edged.

Tactic No.3 leave a gap in the covers to encourage the drive, there was no evidence that this was a favoured scoring zone, but he is able to produce this shot and with all his other shots negated this might be his only option and how good would he look if he could score a series of 4’s through there? He might see himself put up the order or promoted to the 1st XI? Has he got it in him against Leg-spin?

Tactic No.4 the second most prolific shot we saw was a late cut against the faster bowlers. Have your 3rd man deep when you’re standing at the top of your mark to give the impression that there’s a single there at least and maybe a boundary if the ball is struck wider of his position. Then as soon as you look like you’re about to set off he needs to walk in rapidly shutting down both the single option and the angle and increasing the chance of a catch.
Points to remember…
·         He’s good through the leg-side off of leg-side balls.
·         He’s not good against the ball moving away from the edge of the bat.
·         He’s stays in his crease and appears to value his wicket.
·         If it’s the last 6 overs or so and there’s wickets in hand – he may change his approach and look to go big.

Bowl leg-breaks with varying degrees of turn. If you have a straight ball – Top-spinner, Flipper, Orthodox Back-spinner or some form of nothing ball (Even a seam-up delivery) use that to show that the stumps are under threat. Vary speed and flight and if the wind is in the right direction try and get the end that is going to help with attaining drift.

If the game is played at their home ground on the most westerly wicket the chances are the ball is going to turn and bounce. The bounce in this match was good and consistent – spin it hard! For a general match report see here

P.Bartlett_______________________________
P.Bartlett. I don’t know what I was thinking with this bloke, but I got it completely wrong and didn’t adapt to the situation and it cost me a lot of runs and ruined what would have been good figures. Bartlett replaced Turner and joined Ruffell. All of my focus had been on Turner and Ruffell, particularly Ruffell, as I’d been watching him for what seemed like most of the game, so when Turner went, what with Bartlett being further down the order there may have been an expectation in the back of my mind that he’d be manageable for some reason and would take an over or two to settle? How wrong could I have been! Rather than stay in his wicket he took a more proactive approach and advanced down the wicket and simply hit the ball on the full for four through the leg-side. Having been hit for a number of 4’s I tried spinning one harder trying to get it to drop more dramatically, the ball came out of the hand wrong  and was hit for another 4. I’ve got a vague recollection that none of the deliveries were particularly off-side and that they were all pretty straight (Middle)? and never got to land.

Normally I’d have paid more attention and in my defence I’m going to say because I was so cold I wasn’t thinking straight. Thankfully, this was one of the last overs and I didn’t have to bowl at him again as I recall or I’ve shoved the memory somewhere dark! The next over I was bowling at A.Wade who was also quite aggressive in his approach too… skipping down the wicket and running straight past a ball that allowed Dan Vanderputt to stump him and that was the last ball of the game.

Bartlett, I didn’t see much of him and what did see was all bad for me and good for him. The only observation with regards his batting was that he was a positive player and was aggressive in his approach – lofted drives through the regions indicated in his wagon wheel below and one really well executed sweep shot. He differed totally from all of the others, not staying at home at all, stepping out of his crease to hit the ball on the full against me and our 2nd off-spinner.


With only a couple of overs to face, I’m not sure whether this would be his normal mode of batting, but it’s all we’ve got to go on after this first brief meeting.

Next time or if you’re charged with bowling at him at the same stage in the game, you need to keep in mind that this may be the approach that he’ll take. In which case…

Assume that he is going to be aggressive and don’t play to his strengths based on the evidence here. Hide the ball outside of the off-stump and try him out to see if he has anything to deal with that approach from you. Have all your leg-side fielders in front of square out initially to protect the boundary and you might want to make these your better fielders. He didn’t hit any sixes and their home ground isn’t that big, most of the balls were  in there air initially having been hit hard and flattish. With the fact that you’re bowling wide of the off-stump a small over-spun leg-break mixed with your top-spinner or another straight variation will be worth having a look at. If he does struggle with the off-side approach – look at how he’s playing it – Straight bat or cross bat? Modify your approach in accordance with the strokes he plays… More over-spin or flatter deliveries. If he appears to have no idea where his off-stump is move your delivery/release position on the crease as well and see how that works? If you have a ball that comes in Googly, off-spinning flipper or some other variation use that as well sparingly.

The plan here is basic - given the fact that there's so little to go on. But the basic rule, as with most batsmen it seems is initially... don't bowl leg-side.


If he is looking to hit the ball hard and is managing to do so and you’re leaking runs, push everyone out on the boundary and get him off-strike. Have a re-think and go to plan *2.

Because the evidence at this stage is so flimsy we don’t know where his weaknesses are, so it may be beneficial to explore the option of coming round the wicket if you feel you’re bowling well and bring your length back and bowl faster flatter deliveries targeting the stumps. There’s a massive caveat here; he might, from the first ball be up to it and smack you for 6, so it’s  up to you.
Always watch the other bowler from the other end and look to see how he plays him or her. Try and keep a record of all the batsmen you potentially have to face and watch what they do and how they play the different bowlers looking to identify their strengths and weaknesses. If you’re a young bowler and your parents or grand-parents watch your games, try and get them to record the batters names and where they hit the ball and how far they hit it. This will potentially enable you to identify where not to bowl or where to set your field. Even the most basic of plans is better than no plan!

As with all these plans they’re not set in granite, especially in this first season when I’ve only been able to have a look at these blokes on one occasion at this point in the year. If you pick up on these blog posts and you are a leggie that bowls against the same teams as me, by all means get in touch via the comments and share your own information, as these blokes are looking to destroy us and put us out of the attack!

*Plan 2 - keep an eye on the blog over the summer ready for the next encounters and I'll come up with another plan.






Please note - You set these fields at your own risk. The owner of the blog is in no way responsible for you getting carted around the park for 4's and 6's. Seek professional advice and guidance if in doubt.